Skip to main content

Law, Gospel and the Good Samaritan

We love to identify with characters in the Bible. We love to find ourselves in the story. But do we always find ourselves in the right place? Just think of the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Now, I think we'd all agree that we're not supposed to identify with the robbers. And surely we're not meant to see ourselves as the priest or Levite either (after all, they don't come out of this story looking too well). So who does that leave for us to identify with? And immediately we jump in and cast ourselves as the Good Samaritan.

To be fair, we don't need an awful lot of encouragement to do so, for the expression 'good samartian' has become such a part of our language and culture, that it would be really odd not to see ouIrselves as the 'good samaritan.' After all, charities and hospitals are named after the good samaritan. Everyone in this country knows what a good samaritan is - a good helpful person, the sort of person we should all be! And so we all instinctively 'know' that the message of the parable of the Good Samaritan is:
Don't be a nasty priest or Levite - Be a Good Samaritan instead!
But, as much as that 'meaning' for the parable might be ingrained in us in 21st Century British culture, is it at all what Jesus was saying?

In Luke's Gospel, the Good Samaritan isn't a parable without a context (Luke 10:25-37). We're told why Jesus tells this parable and we're told the events that surround it. Jesus tells the parable in response to the question, 'Who is my neighbour?', a question that still normally goes along with the parable in its retelling. But often in the retelling, Jesus' answer to the question, as well as the fact that this is just a follow-up question in a wider conversation, seems to get left out or muddled up. You see, Jesus' answer to the question tells the questioner, not only who his neighbour is, but also who he is in the story - who we are in the story. And, sorry to disappoint, but Jesus tells the man, and us, that we're not the Good Samaritan. You see, in all our eliminating of possible characters to identify with, we forgot one - the very one we're actually supposed to identify with: the man who was beaten and left for dead. And that's exactly who Jesus says we're supposed to identify with. Just compare the lawyers' question in verse 29 - 'And who is my neighbour?' - with Jesus' question at the end of the parable in verse 36 - 'So which of these three do you think was neighbour to him who fell among the thieves?'. The lawyer is talking about his own neighbour, and Jesus talks about the man who fell among the thieves' neighbour - in other words the lawyer (and, by extension, us as the audience) is the man who fell among the thieves!

So this lawyer asks who his neighbour is, and Jesus tells him a story about how he is a beaten-up man left for dead! What's going on? Well, the answer is in the context. You see, we can't really interpret this parable to mean 'Don't be a nasty priest or Levite - Be a Good Samaritan instead', without violently wrenching it out of its context. So what is the context? It's that the lawyer asks Jesus two questions, not just one. Asking about his neighbour is only a follow-up question to his first question about how to inherit eternal life.

The lawyer tries to trick Jesus with a question about eternal life, but Jesus surprises him by not surprising him, and answers like any good lawyer would, by pointing the lawyer to the Law of God. And then suddenly the lawyer feels the need to justify himself (v.29). He hears the Law, and when he does, it shows him his guilt. And he thinks the way to get round his guilt is for Jesus to lower the bar of the Law. But that's not what he needs at all. What he really needs is for Jesus to speak a second word to him - a Gospel Word. And that's what Jesus does in the parable of the Good Samaritan.

You see, the parable isn't about how we're supposed to be wonderful Good Samaritans. It's about how we're like the beaten-up man. We've been crushed, wounded and left for dead by sin. But there is a true Good Samaritan - One who was despised and rejected by men, yet who comes to save His helpless enemies, and He's the One who's standing right there telling the parable.
Jesus is the true Good Samaritan!
Anyway, if you want to hear a bit more about how Jesus speaks his two words of Law and Gospel to this lawyer, how Jesus is the true Good Samaritan, or how the parable is pretty much Jesus preaching on Hosea 6:1-2, then here's a sermon from Swansea on Sunday on the Good Samaritan.

Popular posts from this blog

These are the Bones of Elisha (Declaring the Word of the Lord)

One of the most curious events in all of Scripture is found in a single verse in 2 Kings 13. That chapter records the death of the prophet Elisha, and yet, there’s still one more story of Elisha here some time after his death. 2 Kings 13:21 tells us:
So it was, as they were burying a man, that suddenly they spied a band of raiders; and they put the man in the tomb of Elisha; and when the man was let down and touched the bones of Elisha, he revived and stood on his feet. Elisha was dead. And yet when a corpse was thrown into his tomb hastily in an attempt to hide from marauding bands of Moabites, the man came back to life simply by his corpse touching Elisha’s bones. Even as miracles go, that one’s quite impressive.

On the Church and On Sin: With a (former) Tory MP and a Catholic Priest

What with the Extraordinary Synod going on in Rome this week, the Roman Catholic Church has been in the news a bit of late. And as a result of all this pre-synod hype in the media, two Roman Catholics wrote two of the best articles I read last week. One was an article in the Catholic Herald by a priest. The other was an article in the Spectator by a former MP. You should read both of them. (But if you're not going to read both, then please at least read the second one!)

Now, maybe that seems a bit odd. I am, after all, both a Pentecostal pastor and an Ulster Protestant. And as such, I'm convinced that very significant aspects of Roman Catholic theology are seriously wrong. I still believe that justification by faith alone is the article on which the church stands or falls. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't read, and even learn from, Roman Catholics. Although we are justified by faith alone, it is by faith in Christ alone, not faith in the right formulation of the doc…

Money, Money, Money (Must Be Funny, in a Rich Man’s World!)

‘Not the Pentecostals! Watch out – they’ll be trying to get all your money.’
     – The reaction when a new Christian told her Muslim uncle that she’d got saved and           started attending a Pentecostal church. ‘Hello, I’m calling from [“Christian” TV channel]. We have some great deals on advertising during our broadcasts and wondered if the church would be interested.’
     – A phone call yesterday. ‘$11,150’
     – the amount one American church is appealing to raise to produce a worship album $750 plus expenses
     – an American amount recommended as a gift for visiting preachers ‘US pastors paid up to $300,000 - are Church of England vicars getting a raw deal?’
     – recent Headline in Christian Today

£5.75 million
     – the amount of money an evangelical church down south is trying to raise for               building improvements.$25,000
     – the amount two American pastors are raising to produce a six minute teaching video Money has been on my mind a bit of late. Not my …