Skip to main content

Book Review: Why We're Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be)

Kevin DeYoung & Ted Kluck, Why We're Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) (Chicago: Moody, 2008)

Why We're Not Emergent is quite a quick and easy read ( I did, after all, come to it directly from Fesko's tome on Justification). I read it in two evenings and thoroughly enjoyed it. I mention my enjoyment because, on such a touchy subject as the emergent church, enjoyment was not at all what I expected. I think that's the real genius of this format. DeYoung and Kluck write alternate chapters, so there is a continual swapping of style and content. Kevin DeYoung writes as a theologian; his chapters offer theological analysis and critique. Ted Kluck, on the other hand, writes as a journalist; he reports interviews, visits to churches and events, personal impressions, etc. The alternation of authors and styles left me always ready to go on to the next chapter.

Both Kluck and DeYoung fit into the right demographic for the emergent church, yet neither is following their peers to emergent pastures. Obviously in 256 pages they can't examine every aspect of emergent thought or every emergent author/blogger/spokesman, yet they do a great job in boiling the matter down to essentials. At the end of the day, the whole issue is one of theology, not style. As a result, DeYoung engages the emergents over the knowability of God, the authority of Scripture, the necessity of doctrine, and the identity of Jesus. In addition to these theological issues he also looks at emergent claims about modernism. Kluck looks at such matters as Velvet Elvis, tolerance, an emergent music festival, an emergent music festival, a visit to Rob Bell's church, and why he doesn't want a cool pastor.

All in all it's a great introduction to get you thinking about some of the important issues at stake. DeYoung and Kluck manage to introduce and critique the emergent church without disintegrating into the semi-intelligible postmodern philosophical jargon which seems to be in vogue among many of the emergent writers, because at the end of the day it's not about postmodern philosophy; you don't need to have written a dissertation on Derrida or Foucault to understand the issues at stake. Why not? Simply because ultimately it all comes down to theology, and more specifically to the authority of Scripture.

DeYoung and Kluck stand for the authority of Scripture, and so, even if they are of the requisite age and socio-economic status, they aren't emergent.

If you're suddenly encountering the ideas of the emergent church, this book is the place to go for a concise (and very readable), Biblical response.

Popular posts from this blog

These are the Bones of Elisha (Declaring the Word of the Lord)

One of the most curious events in all of Scripture is found in a single verse in 2 Kings 13. That chapter records the death of the prophet Elisha, and yet, there’s still one more story of Elisha here some time after his death. 2 Kings 13:21 tells us:
So it was, as they were burying a man, that suddenly they spied a band of raiders; and they put the man in the tomb of Elisha; and when the man was let down and touched the bones of Elisha, he revived and stood on his feet. Elisha was dead. And yet when a corpse was thrown into his tomb hastily in an attempt to hide from marauding bands of Moabites, the man came back to life simply by his corpse touching Elisha’s bones. Even as miracles go, that one’s quite impressive.

On the Church and On Sin: With a (former) Tory MP and a Catholic Priest

What with the Extraordinary Synod going on in Rome this week, the Roman Catholic Church has been in the news a bit of late. And as a result of all this pre-synod hype in the media, two Roman Catholics wrote two of the best articles I read last week. One was an article in the Catholic Herald by a priest. The other was an article in the Spectator by a former MP. You should read both of them. (But if you're not going to read both, then please at least read the second one!)

Now, maybe that seems a bit odd. I am, after all, both a Pentecostal pastor and an Ulster Protestant. And as such, I'm convinced that very significant aspects of Roman Catholic theology are seriously wrong. I still believe that justification by faith alone is the article on which the church stands or falls. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't read, and even learn from, Roman Catholics. Although we are justified by faith alone, it is by faith in Christ alone, not faith in the right formulation of the doc…

Money, Money, Money (Must Be Funny, in a Rich Man’s World!)

‘Not the Pentecostals! Watch out – they’ll be trying to get all your money.’
     – The reaction when a new Christian told her Muslim uncle that she’d got saved and           started attending a Pentecostal church. ‘Hello, I’m calling from [“Christian” TV channel]. We have some great deals on advertising during our broadcasts and wondered if the church would be interested.’
     – A phone call yesterday. ‘$11,150’
     – the amount one American church is appealing to raise to produce a worship album $750 plus expenses
     – an American amount recommended as a gift for visiting preachers ‘US pastors paid up to $300,000 - are Church of England vicars getting a raw deal?’
     – recent Headline in Christian Today

£5.75 million
     – the amount of money an evangelical church down south is trying to raise for               building improvements.$25,000
     – the amount two American pastors are raising to produce a six minute teaching video Money has been on my mind a bit of late. Not my …