Skip to main content


Book Give Away!

I wrote a new book which came out last Easter just after the first lockdown started, and so, well, even I sort of forgot about it. But, I eventually got my hands on a few copies, so, I'd like to give two of them away.  The book is about the theology of the founders of the Apostolic Church, so it should hopefully be of interest to Apostolic pastors, which means one of the copies is reserved for any pastor in the Apostolic Church. The other copy is for anyone in the UK (because international postage is too expensive, sorry!). Here's the link to enter the competition. (I've never tried making a competition before, so sorry if it's not the most slick!) There are four ways to enter.  1) Subscribe to the blog by email. 2) Follow me on Twitter. 3) Tweet about the competition using via the competition page above.  4) For the pastor copy, any pastor can email me at the address in the Apostolic Church UK Staff Address Book.  You can see the full table of contents on the Google b

Apostles today & Sola Scriptura?

Can one believe that there are apostles today and still believe in Sola Scriptura? What does one have to do with the other? Increasingly cessationists (those who don't believe that the supernatural gifts of the Spirit continue today) are pointing to the existence of contemporary apostles as being incompatible with the doctrine of Sola Scriptura. Apostles, they reason, have some sort of authority independant of and above that of the Bible.

If this idea of apostleship were true, it would indeed be a denial of Sola Scriptura, for it would make the apostles the ultimate authority for the Church rather than the Bible. This would almost tend towards the Roman Catholic idea of the Magisterium (the bishops being seen as the successors of the apostles).

Wayne Grudem argues that the words of the apostles were 'the very words of God' (The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today [Eastbourne: Kingsway, 2000], 30). He goes on to write that 'to disbelieve or disobey an apostle's authoritative words is to disbelieve or disobey God' (ibid. 33). This sentance bears an uncanny resemblance to Grudem's definition of the authority of Scripture:
The authority of Scripture means that all the words in
Scripture are God's words in such a way that to disbelive or disobey any word of
Scripture is to disbelieve or disobey God.

(Grudem, Systematic Theology [Leicester: IVP, 1994], 73). Thus it is no wonder that Grudem concludes: 'In place of living apostles present in the church to teach and govern it, we have instead the writings of the apostles in the books of the New Testament' (The Gift of Prophecy, 235). For Grudem, one is obliged to choose between Sola Scriptura and contemporary apostleship.

But must we really choose between the two? Can we not have both? For nearly a century the position of the Apostolic Church has been that present-day apostleship and Sola Scriptura are not mutually exclusive beliefs; we can, and do believe in (and practise) both.

But how can that be? For the answer, I'm afraid you'll have to wait for the next post!