Applying Irenaeus on True and False Pastors and Elders in the Evangelical & Pentecostal World Today

18:40

Irenaeus (a disciple of a disciple of the apostle John) was convinced that 'it is necessary to obey the presbyters [pastors and elders] who are in the Church' (Against Heresies 4.26.2). He wasn't just making that up, by the way - it's a Scriptural principal (Heb. 13:17). And Irenaeus particularly points this out in connection with the right reading of the Scriptures, seeing Christ and His Gospel in the Scriptures. It is, after all, the task of the presbyters to feed the flock by proclaiming Christ biblically.

But, if we're to obey, or submit, to the presbyters who are in the church, that means we need to know who the true presbyters are. That's a major issue today, just as it was in Irenaeus' day. You see, Irenaeus realised something that we often don't realise: just because someone claims to be a pastor, doesn't mean they really are a pastor. So Irenaeus gives us some helpful advice on how to distinguish true and false presbyters.

Now, before I give you a few points from Irenaeus, I have to be an honest historian and point out that there are some difficulties with what Irenaeus has to say for us today. Irenaeus was living at a time when the church was one united whole, but we don't live in such a time. Irenaeus was living at a time when people knew people who knew the apostles. He himself was a disciple of Polycarp who had been ordained as an elder by the apostle John. So when Irenaeus writes about presbyters having 'succession from the apostles', he's not thinking of tracing who ordained whom back through 2000 years of history (as in the modern concept of apostolic succession - which, interestingly enough is focused on bishops, not presbyters like Irenaeus), but rather he's talking about people who were actually ordained by the apostles, discipled by the apostles, trained by the apostles (or by their immediate successors - we're only talking about one generation's gap here).

Yet, despite the differences between Irenaeus' time and our own, I think his advice on distinguishing true and false presbyters is very useful to us today. So let me just give you three points from Irenaeus:

1.) Be Suspicious of Those who Set Themselves Up as Pastors
'We need to view with suspicion those who turn from the primitive succession and assemble themselves together elsewhere, for they are either heretics of perverse minds, schismatics puffed-up and self-pleasing, or hypocrites who act this way for money or vainglory; all these have fallen from the truth.' (Against Heresies, 4.26.2)
Now, I have some friends who would use this passage to tell me I need to become an Anglican or a Roman Catholic, by reading it in light of the modern idea of apostolic succession. This is why I've pointed out that we do have some difficulties in applying Irenaeus directly, but that doesn't mean we can't apply him at all. As I've said already, Irenaeus is referring to something slightly different when he writes about succession, so rather than read this passage as saying presbyters must be ordained by a bishop who can trace the lineage of his ordination all the way back to the apostles, we need to get back into the 2nd Century situation where the presbyters had all either been ordained by the apostles themselves or their immediate successors to see how to read this. And, we need to remember that here it's the succession of presbyters, not the succession of bishops that Irenaeus is writing about.

So Irenaeus' focus here is on those who set themselves up as pastors, rather than being recognised and ordained by the church - something which is more and more common today. Christ has given pastors as a gift to the Church (Eph. 4:11), therefore pastors don't exist independently of the Church. It isn't a gift to an individual, who can then recognise himself as a pastor and set up his own 'ministry', 'fellowship', or 'church'. No. The gift is to the church, and therefore the church must recognise the call.

Those who ignore the churchly aspect of calling to the ministry and go ahead and set themselves up as pastors unilaterally are dangerously ignoring God's revealed way of working; in other words, it's disobedience to His Word, and therefore sin. Irenaeus shows us that the sin can be one of three types, but all are equally dangerous to the flock of God: either it can be the sin of 1) heresy (he has to set up his own group and proclaim himself a pastor, because his false teachings would never be accepted in the true church), 2) schism (which is the sin of dividing the Body of Christ - a sin which we tend to take very lightly indeed in Pentecostal and Evangelical circles today), or 3) hypocrisy (he's in it for all the wrong reasons).

2.) Not all those whom people think are presbyters are really presbyters
There are some whom many believe to be presbyters; however, these people serve their own lusts and do not place the fear of God supreme in their hearts, but conduct themselves with contempt towards others, exult in holding a place of prominence, and do evil in secret saying 'No one sees us'. (Against Heresies, 4.26.3)
Okay, so we already ruled out people setting themselves up as pastors, but what about those who seem to be more respectable? Are they automatically okay? Here Irenaeus warns us that even among those who have a respectable position, yet they aren't really serving as presbyters. This wasn't something particularly new. The apostle John had already had to deal with Diotrephes 'who love[d] to have the preeminence' (3 John 1:9).

There's a little chiasm in Irenaeus' text here:
A1: these people serve their own lusts & do not place the fear of God supreme in their hearts
          B1: but conduct themselves with contempt towards others
          B2: exult in holding a place of prominence
A2: and do evil in secret saying 'No one sees us'
So Irenaeus is getting at two things here: these "presbyters" place their own desires above God and place themselves above others. In other words, they care more about themselves, their own comfort, and their position, than they do about sacrificially caring for Christ's flock. So, although they may have the title of pastor or elder, they don't have the heart of a pastor or elder.

And once again, this is something quite relevant today. Men who set themselves up as the untouchable "man of God", who lord it over the people of God, who "minister" for large sums to feed their own material lusts, or who try to turn evil into "good" by claiming that the Holy Spirit told them it was okay, are not true pastors, despite the titles and positions they might hold. But this doesn't only apply to the extremes of the tele-evangelists, but also in ordinary churches, when men start to think that the flock is there for their benefit, rather than seeing that they are there to serve and feed the flock.

3.) The True Presbyters hold fast to the doctrine of the Apostles

Okay, so Irenaeus has given us two ways to recognise false presbyters, but what about the true ones?
So it behooves us to turn away from all such people, but to hold fast to those who hold the doctrine of the apostles ... these people display sound speech and blameless conduct which serves to confirm and correct others ... The Church treasures such presbyters ... So where the gifts of the Lord have been placed, there it behooves us to learn the truth - namely from those who possess that succession of the Church which is from the apostles, and among whom exists what is sound and blameless in conduct, as well as what is unadulterated and incorrupt in speech. These people preserve this faith of ours in one God who created all things, and they increase our love for the Son of God, who accomplished such marvelous dispensations for our sake; and they expound the Scriptures to us without danger, neither blaspheming God, nor dishonouring the patriarchs, nor despising the prophets. (Against Heresies, 4.26.4-5)
The true presbyters are not like the false ones. Unlike the false ones, they are both examples in their conduct and they are called, ordained and serve within the Church. But their conduct and their collegiality all flows from the primary way in which we recognise them: they hold fast to the doctrine of the apostles. Really this shouldn't be that much of a shock - after all, if the whole church is to 'continue steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine', then it's certainly true of the elders. In fact, the one qualification that sets elders apart from deacons (or even from general descriptions of growing Christian maturity) is that elders are to be 'apt to teach' (1 Tim. 3:2), and you can't be 'apt to teach' within the Church without a firm grasp of the apostles' doctrine. Irenaeus goes on to describe this teaching ministry: the presbyters 'preserve this faith of ours' and 'they expound the Scriptures to us without danger'; in other words, they defend the faith, pass it on, and proclaim it in preaching.That's what true presbyters will be found doing - not starting innovative, new movements, but passing on 'the faith once delivered' and proclaiming Christ biblically.



You Might Also Like

0 comments

Blog Archive

The Tenets of the Apostolic Church


The Unity of the Godhead, and Trinity of the Persons therein.

The utter depravity of human nature, the necessity for repentance and regeneration and the eternal doom of the finally impenitent.

The virgin birth, sinless life, atoning death, triumphant resurrection, ascension, and abiding intercession of our Lord Jesus Christ; His second coming, and millennial reign upon earth.

Justification and Sanctification of the believer through the finished work of Christ.

The Baptism of the Holy Ghost for believers, with signs following.

The nine gifts of the Holy Ghost for the edification, exhortation and comfort of the Church, which is the body of Christ.

The Sacraments of Baptism by immersion and of the Lord's Supper.

The Divine inspiration and authority of the Holy Scriptures.

Church government by apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers, elders and deacons.

The possibility of falling from grace.

The obligatory nature of tithes and offerings.